Comparison

Tierux vs Qonversion

Qonversion built its reputation on rich subscription analytics and cross-platform dashboards — teams that live inside their MRR charts and cohort reports gravitate toward it. Tierux takes a different angle: strip the manual store-setup toil by handing it to an AI agent over MCP, charge a flat fee per subscriber, and put Android on equal footing with iOS. Here's the honest breakdown — including where Qonversion is ahead.

CapabilityTieruxQonversion
Agent-run store setupGoogle Cloud service account + APIs automated; Apple = Bundle ID + one manual notification-URL stepManual setup
Android-native depthCore focusSupported, cross-platform
iOS / App Store verificationYes, with limitations (Swift SDK + server verifier; less production-hardened than our Play path)Yes, mature
Server-side verificationStore-verified on our servers, zero-trust clientYes
Pricing modelFlat $39/mo up to 1,000 subscribers0.6% of MRR above $10,000/mo free threshold
Remote paywall configYesYes
Win-back / cancellation offersGoogle Play — yes; App Store — not yetLimited
Paywall A/B testing & experimentsNot yetBasic
Subscription analyticsEntitlement analytics dashboardExtensive, analytics-heavy
Scale & tractionPre-launch — we're honest about our stageProven, mid-scale

Comparison reflects Tierux's shipped capabilities and Qonversion's publicly documented platform. We don't claim parity on analytics depth — that's Qonversion's strength.

Teams that pick Qonversion typically run established subscription apps where understanding user cohorts and revenue trends is the primary day-to-day workflow. The trade-off is price: at $100,000 MRR, Qonversion's 0.6% fee comes to $540/mo, while Tierux charges the same flat $39/mo regardless of how large your revenue grows.

When to choose which

Choose Tierux if…

Your team wants the store-credential plumbing handled by an AI agent — Google Cloud APIs, products, and paywalls provisioned in one prompt — rather than clicking through console screens; you care more about predictable monthly costs (flat $39/mo) than deep analytics dashboards; and you're building for Android with equal or greater priority than iOS, where Tierux's native Kotlin SDK provides deeper platform integration; Apple App Store support is implemented with limitations (see platform support).

Choose Qonversion if…

Subscription analytics, revenue attribution, and cross-platform cohort reports are the lens through which your team makes every business decision, and you're willing to trade a percentage of MRR for a mature analytics engine with mid-scale community adoption.

Frequently asked questions

How does Tierux compare to Qonversion?
Tierux is an AI-agent-native, MCP-driven subscription platform with flat pricing and Android-native depth. Qonversion is an analytics-heavy, cross-platform subscription infrastructure tool with revenue-share pricing at 0.6% of MRR above $10,000/mo free. Tierux replaces manual setup with automated agent workflows.
What is Tierux's pricing compared to Qonversion?
Tierux charges a flat $39/mo for up to 1,000 subscribers, then +$30/1,000. Qonversion charges 0.6% of MRR above a $10,000/mo free tier. At $100,000 MRR, Qonversion costs $540/mo vs Tierux's flat pricing that typically comes in much lower.
Can an AI agent set up Tierux?
Yes. Tierux's MCP server lets your AI agent automate store setup — Google Cloud service accounts, APIs, products, and paywalls — in one prompt. Qonversion requires manual setup across both Google Play and Apple consoles.
Is Tierux suitable for cross-platform apps?
Yes. Tierux supports both Google Play and Apple App Store with server-side verification for both platforms. Android is a core focus with a native Kotlin SDK; iOS verification is handled server-side with Swift SDK source available for audit and local integration.

Try the AI-native path

Free tier — unlimited apps, 1 paywall. No credit card, no revenue share.

Start free